Data Engineering, Databases & Analytics
Kornspire builds data platforms: ingestion and transformation pipelines, dimensional models, database performance and administration, governed metrics and reporting people trust.
The problem
Two reports, one question, different numbers
The usual failure is not a missing dashboard; it is a definition. Revenue is calculated three ways, active customer means something different in each department, and the monthly pack is rebuilt by hand because nobody trusts the automated version. Reports stop being used for decisions and become material for arguments.
Signals you have this problem
- The same metric has different values in different reports
- Analysts spend most of their time collecting and cleaning rather than analysing
- Reporting queries run against production and slow the application down
- Nobody can explain how a number on a dashboard was derived
Our approach
Define the metric before building the dashboard
We write the metric definitions with the people who own them, then build the pipeline backwards from those definitions: ingestion, a modelled layer with tests on the assumptions that matter, and a governed metric layer that reports read from. Analytics workloads are separated from transactional ones so reporting cannot degrade the product.
Data architecture
Source inventory, ingestion patterns, storage layer selection, and the separation of transactional and analytical workloads.
Pipelines and data processing
Batch and incremental ingestion, transformation, scheduling, idempotent reruns, late-arriving data handling and failure alerting.
Modelling and the semantic layer
Dimensional or wide-table modelling with documented grain, plus governed metric definitions that reports consume rather than reinvent.
Database administration and performance
Index and query tuning, schema and migration review, connection and pool sizing, partitioning, backup verification and upgrade planning.
Data quality and testing
Assertions on uniqueness, referential integrity, freshness, range and volume, with failures surfaced to owners rather than buried in logs.
Reporting and self-service
Dashboards built on governed models, with definitions visible to the reader and access controls aligned to data sensitivity.
Governance and privacy
Data classification, retention rules, minimisation, pseudonymisation and access audit — designed alongside Indian DPDP Act and GDPR obligations.
Outcomes
What changes for you
- Metric definitions written down and applied consistently
- Reports that reconcile, so meetings discuss decisions instead of numbers
- Reporting load removed from transactional databases
- Data quality failures detected by the system before a reader finds them
Deliverables
What you receive
- Data architecture and source inventory
- Pipeline code with scheduling and alerting
- Modelled warehouse layer with documented grain
- Metric dictionary agreed with business owners
- Data quality test suite
- Dashboards plus a short guide to reading them
Evidence
What you can check before you call
Each item below links to something you can verify yourself — our own product, this website, or the engineering playbook we publish.
- Our product
Analytics on operational data
Revenue, retention, staff and campaign reporting modelled from Upkilo's transactional data.
Analytics & Insights on upkilo.com(opens in a new tab) - Engineering playbook
ADR-004: how Upkilo isolates tenant data
Why Upkilo uses schema-per-tenant in PostgreSQL, the two alternatives we rejected, and the failure mode that decided it.
Read ADR-004(opens in a new tab)
How it runs
The engagement, step by step
- 01
Inventory and define
Catalogue sources and current reports; agree metric definitions with their owners. Disagreements are resolved here, not later.
- 02
Build the pipeline
Ingestion and transformation with tests on the assumptions that matter, reruns that are safe, and alerting on freshness and volume.
- 03
Model and govern
Modelled layer and metric definitions, access controls by data sensitivity, and documentation exposed to readers.
- 04
Enable
Dashboards, training for the people who will use them, and a review cadence for definitions as the business changes.
- PostgreSQL
- SQL Server
- Python
- dbt
- Apache Airflow
- Power BI
- Metabase
- Azure Data Factory
Typical engagements
What this looks like in practice
Illustrative shapes of work rather than client stories. We publish client work only with the client's consent and with real figures, so these describe the problem and the approach instead.
One trusted operational dashboard
A single governed view of the numbers a leadership team reviews weekly, with every definition traceable to its source.
Separating reporting from production
Moving analytical queries off the transactional database, restoring application performance without losing reporting depth.
Preparing data for machine learning
Feature definitions, historical backfills and leakage-aware training datasets built on the same governed models as reporting.
Answers
Data Engineering, Databases & Analytics: questions
What is data engineering and analytics?
Data engineering and analytics is the work of moving data from its source systems into a modelled, documented store, and turning it into governed metrics and reports that are consistent regardless of who runs them.
Do we need a data warehouse, or is our database enough?
If reporting is light and does not interfere with the application, a read replica and well-chosen indexes are often sufficient — and far cheaper to operate. A warehouse earns its place when you need to combine several sources, keep history that the transactional system overwrites, or run analytical queries that would otherwise degrade production.
Can you work with our existing BI tool?
Yes. The governed model and metric layer are the durable assets; the visualisation tool sits on top and is comparatively easy to change. We build so that replacing the front end later does not mean rebuilding the definitions.
How is personal data handled in analytics?
By classifying it at ingestion, minimising what reaches the analytical layer, pseudonymising or aggregating where the analysis does not need identity, applying retention rules, and restricting and auditing access. This is designed against India's DPDP Act 2023 and, where relevant, GDPR — with your legal advisers confirming the obligations that apply to you.
What makes a dashboard trustworthy?
Three things, none of them visual: a definition the reader can see, a freshness indicator that shows when the data last updated, and tests that fail loudly when an assumption breaks. Without those, a dashboard is a rendering of unverified numbers.
Deep dives
5 detailed articles on this topic
Longer technical pieces, each covering one specific decision inside this service. Written to be argued with, not skimmed.
Keep reading
Related services
Considering data engineering, databases & analytics?
Tell us the outcome you need and the constraints you are working inside. You will get a straight answer about whether this is the right service, a smaller one, or none of ours.
Prefer email? hello@kornspire.com